Here’s a thought: if you are called out for using stolen images as ads for your mini sessions delete *all* the stolen photos you’ve used, not just the ones called out.
Then, also don’t do whatever the fuck this idiot idea is:
You cannot use images that you do not have the copyright to for advertisement of your own photography work. Not privately, not publicly.
I noticed that she has cropped out watermarks so she’s aware of what she’s doing and could have easily found the original sources and asked for permission (at least sometimes) but chose not to.
Update 6/12/2026: Britney is back to advertising for wedding photography using flyers that are likely AI with likely AI created imagery. She is now posting as “Britney Anne” but is still using Klump Image and is claiming to be getting back behind the camera. I was alerted to this last month.
The commenters pinged the images that were likely AI, as did Meta as you can see from the tag “AI info” above.
In one of the posts with this flyer she was called out about the AI use but somehow turned it into an allegation that I called her drunk? I’ve never talked to this woman. I also am rarely drunk? What a weird comeback.
Anyway, I wasn’t going to update the post since I was busy with my work as I’ve shot 9 weddings in 3 weeks. Then this morning this missive landed in my inbox from Britney.
Let’s just quickly nip this in the bud:
When I wrote the update regarding Ashley, she had requested a refund for their wedding and had not received one. Eventually Ashley filed for a chargeback with her bank but the bank sided with Britney. According to the client, no refund was made to them for their wedding. They *were* awarded the chargeback for the $340 invoice for the separate engagement session they booked and did not utilize before the wedding. They originally had intentions to use it after the wedding but after they got the images back they opted to not move forward with another session with the company.
I never claimed Ashley didn’t receive her photos, quite the contrary. I posted she *did* receive them and was unhappy with them.
I stand by that Ashley did not receive the quality of images comparable to the images displayed on Klump Image’s website at the time of their booking.
This is her own defense from 20024
Update 8/21/2024: Britany decided to threaten a lawsuit against me claiming slander but then chose to come to the original Facebook Post about her to lie about me/Photo Stealers (apparently a guy named Ed works with me on this page? NEWS TO ME!) and just being an absolute menace.
Since she’s being such an utter chaos gremlin I’m updating this post with not only more proof of her using images on her website that she did not create but also stories from one of her “clients” who is rightfully upset with the images they received from Britany’s ‘associate’ that she sent that had never photographed a wedding before.
I got married in the Outer Banks so I’m in a lot of groups related to it since it’s one of my favorite places on Earth. I also still have a great relationship with my wedding photographers so I feel protective of the photographers in the area.
This morning I saw a post come across my feed that was alerting people that Bluegrass Photography, who for was advertising *really* cheap mini sessions ($45) for the Outer Banks (I’m assuming while she is there on vacation, she does not live there), uses images in her ads that aren’t her own.
Cue the research don’t undercut my beloved photographers AND have stolen images! Also, this isn’t everything from the FB group but I have places to be today so I had to cut it off.
This wall of shame is dedicated to photographers that feel that it's okay to steal others' work and post it as their own. Oh I'm sorry, it's okay to let their "web designer" do it.
